To make the investigation of readers less time consuming I summarized the results in the table below and tried to put my findings in a clear-cut way. Anyway, you can specify the way of implementation in each tested service looking through the step-by-step explanations.
In the table below you can check products I considered eligible to appear in master-detail form testing:
|Dabble DB||Possible, but with the shortcomings of the system.||There were too many "peculiarities" of implementation which caused a number of difficulties.|
|TrackVia||Not possible. There is no way to build master detail form.||It seems to me that currently Track Via program is developed for single table/database applications.|
|QuickBase||Possible, the set up is pretty easy.||The system handles the issue, the only drawback: you can’t add/edit items on one and the same screen with header.|
|Coghead||Possible. Two ways of set up are suggested: Local Grid and Linked Grid||None of given variants is an ideal way of this function implementation. Even though I managed to set up everything.|
|Zoho Creator||Not possible. Zoho offers to use Deluge Scripting instead of master detail form.||Puzzling the user with too cumbersome alternative, which doesn’t solve the problem.|
|TeamDesk||Possible, fast way of implementation is offered.||I liked the system capability to handle a lot of implicit work on its own.|
So, hopefully this sneak peak outlines what to expect choosing one of the listed products.